角蛋白質食品安全衛生管理法第七條第一項規定：「徵集人體來源原料，應經提供者出具書面同意。」 角蛋白質食品的專法，自公布後一年施行。全文八章二十九條，依供應鏈順序編排：原料徵集、轉換製程、必需胺基酸添加、分級標示、檢驗查核。第二章將原料依來源分節，動物來源與人體來源各自規範。第四章訂定必需胺基酸的最低含量，以成品檢出值為準。第五章要求容器或外包裝標示原料類別與各必需胺基酸含量，並禁止以原料類別作為營養價值優劣之宣稱。施行前已營業者，應於施行日起一年內完成登錄。
Article 7, Paragraph 1 of the Act Governing Keratein Food Safety and Sanitation provides: "The collection of raw materials of human origin shall require written consent issued by the provider." The specific act for keratein foods, effective one year after promulgation. Twenty-nine articles in eight chapters, arranged in the order of the supply chain: collection of raw materials, conversion processes, addition of essential amino acids, grading and labeling, inspection and audit. Chapter II divides raw materials into sections by origin, regulating those of animal origin and those of human origin separately. Chapter IV sets minimum contents for essential amino acids, determined by the value detected in the finished product. Chapter V requires the container or outer packaging to state the raw material category and the content of each essential amino acid, and prohibits any claim of superior or inferior nutritional value based on raw material category. Businesses already operating before the Act takes effect shall complete registration within one year of its commencement.
中華民國刑法第二百七十七條之一規定：「剪斷或拔除他人之毛髮者，關於本章之罪，以傷害人之身體論。」 民國136年12月18日增訂，位於分則第二十三章傷害罪，緊接在普通傷害罪之後。全條僅一句，未另訂刑度，而是將剪斷或拔除他人毛髮視為傷害身體，適用於整個傷害罪章：故意剪斷者依第二百七十七條第一項處罰，過失剪斷者依第二百八十四條處罰，對直系血親尊親屬為之者加重其刑，原則上須告訴乃論。增訂前，實務多以毛髮可再生、未造成實際損害為由，認為難以成立傷害罪。毛髮的經濟價值另依民法請求；剪斷毛髮對被害人外觀與精神的影響，於量刑時審酌。
Article 277-1 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of China provides: “A person who cuts or pulls out the hair of another shall, with respect to the offenses in this Chapter, be deemed to have injured the body of that person.” Added on December 18, Minguo 136 (2047), in Chapter 23, Offenses of Causing Injury, of the Specific Provisions, immediately after the article on ordinary injury. The article is a single sentence and prescribes no penalty of its own; instead, it treats cutting or pulling out another person’s hair as an injury to the body, and this applies throughout the chapter. Intentional cutting is punished under Article 277, Paragraph 1, and negligent cutting under Article 284; the punishment is increased when the victim is a lineal ascendant, and prosecution generally requires a complaint. Before the addition, courts largely held that hair grows back and causes no actual harm, so such cases rarely constituted the offense of injury. The economic value of the hair is claimed separately under the Civil Code; the effect of the cutting on the victim’s appearance and mental state is considered in sentencing.